Why user-centered design is not enough
by John Wood
Vitruvian Man by Leonardo da Vinci via Wikimedia Commons
Utopia or Oblivion?
Buckminster Fuller framed this question in his 1993 book of the same
name, warning that mankind's prospects would go decisively one way, or
the other. Twenty years on, it is clear that nobody could have answered
his question with any certainty. This is because we are all entangled in
it. Fortunately, most of us have heard of the butterfly effect,
so we are slowly realising that each one of us has some responsibility
for what happens. What does this mean for 'UCD' (User-Centered Design)?
Putting The User at the Center
In 1966, Joseph Weizenbaum
created ELIZA, a computer program for diagnosing medical conditions. It
conversed with patients directly, via screen-based questions in
everyday language. But it did it so cunningly that most correspondents
thought they were talking to a human being. The question and answer
routine was based on the psychotherapeutic approach of Carl Rogers,
best-known for developing an extremely patient-centered approach.
Technologically speaking, the program was very simple. First, it
addressed the respondent using her first name, asked open-ended
questions about their state of health and incorporated some of their own
words in its answer. The strategy worked so well that users were
convinced they were talking to a sympathetic doctor, rather than a
machine.
.... Read the full article in: http://www.core77.com/